In my experience, the hard part about creating a game isn't figuring out the concept, or the mechanics, or even coming up with the specific rules. It is writing them down. Putting pen to paper isn't the challenge, but explaining the rules to somebody who isn't as intimate with them as I am is often quite difficult.
Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Sunday, August 11, 2013
It's Pretty Simple: Complicated vs. Complex
One of my problems early in game design was learning how to get through the language barrier. What makes it tricky is that it isn't an actual language, and that it isn't really codified anywhere. When working internationally, you can learn a foreign language or pick up on cultural behaviors. When programming or working in tech, again, you can learn the literal language and study the jargon. With game design, different designers often use the same words to say different things. From my experiences, the language used is not necessarily constant, and that can lead to arguments that end up being semantics, but the debaters believe that they are arguing over the core of a term.
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
Game Design: Breaking the Seesaw
Time to enter the ring for another bout with balance. The last two posts have been about single player and multi-player balance respectively. This time, I'm going to try to look at a few different methods and approaches to balancing games. By changing the way you approach balancing, you change the way the game is played. Additionally, you oftentimes have to come to an accord with outside forces influencing your game.
Labels:
Discussion,
Game Mechanics,
Go,
Super Smash Bros
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Game Design: Playing on the Seesaw
In my previous post, I talked at some length about balance, particularly in single player environments. This time around, I'm going to dive into multi-player balance. As previously explored, the core of single player balance is making sure that the player continues to be able to make interesting and valid choices. This continues to be true in multi-player games, but requires additional care.
Labels:
Age of Empires,
Discussion,
Game Mechanics,
Pokemon,
Risk,
Skyrim,
Starcraft 2,
World of Warcraft
Monday, August 5, 2013
Game Design: Keeping the Spoon on the Nose
To me, as a designer, balance means a couple different things. In a single player game, it means that the player has interesting and valid choices available to them. For multi-player, it means that given equal skill, from the beginning of the game, each player has an equal chance to win. Its a bit more complicated than that however, so let's dive in.
Labels:
Discussion,
Game Mechanics,
Mass Effect,
Minecraft,
Saints Row,
Skyrim
Sunday, August 4, 2013
Mafia: A Game of Disorganized Crime
For more than the past decade, I've traditionally gone camping with a number of other families. I bring this up, because, around the campfire, we often play the game "Mafia". The game rules are fairly simple, and we generally kept to the base rules with minimum fuss. Once diving past the base level of play, it becomes a fascinating game. The choices the players make are very rarely based on any concrete evidence provided to them from the game, but instead are based on conjecture and uninformed guesses.
Thursday, August 1, 2013
How Guns Work (in Mass Effect)
The following is an article I wrote and posted a year or two back, talking about the then-upcomming Mass Effect 3. Its mostly a rant on the various ways to set up and design ammunition in a game. Without further ado, the original post:
Labels:
Bioware,
Discussion,
Game Mechanics,
Mass Effect
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)